| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
05/05/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/05/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
|
Autor : |
RESTAINO, E.; CASTRO, M.; CUITIÑO, M.J.; NOLLA, F.; CASTRO, B.; CARDOZO, V. |
|
Afiliación : |
ERNESTO ANGEL RESTAINO GALUP, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARINA CASTRO DERENYI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA JOSE CUITIÑO DE VEGA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO EDUARDO NOLLA LANFRANCONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BEATRIZ YANET CASTRO ALVARADO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VALERIA NATALY CARDOZO CHICO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
CULTIDATOS_UY. Aplicación de análisis y selección de cultivares. Instructivo de uso: módulo Forrajeras. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Versión 3. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
La Estanzuela, Colonia, (Uruguay): INIA, 2021 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
CultiDatos_uy es una herramienta desarrollada por INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria del Uruguay, www.inia.uy), en base a información pública disponible de la Evaluación Nacional de Cultivares (ENC) del Uruguay de INASE (Instituto Nacional de Semillas). CultiDatos_uy, le posibilita acceder a las principales características de un material o comparar materiales para la correcta elección de acuerdo a su situación productiva particular. La información suministrada resume las principales variables de la evaluación de cada material. Si Usted desea ampliar, buscar información específica o más detallada sobre un cultivar y sus datos, siempre es recomendable acceder a la información de la Evaluación Nacional de Cultivares disponible en http://www.inia.org.uy/convenio_inase_inia/convenio/convenio.htm. El objetivo de CultiDatos_uy, es facilitar el acceso a la información generada en la ENC de
una forma amigable, donde pueda buscar datos específicos de un material conociendo su nombre o empresa representante y/o hacer un análisis comparativo entre materiales. |
|
Palabras claves : |
HERRAMIENTA DE ANÁLISIS; INSTRUCTIVO DE USO. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORRAJERAS; SELECCION DE ESPECIES. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16417/1/Instructivo-de-uso-cultidatos-INIA-forrajeras-v3-03-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01758nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1063103
005 2022-05-05
008 2021 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aRESTAINO, E.
245 $aCULTIDATOS_UY. Aplicación de análisis y selección de cultivares. Instructivo de uso$bmódulo Forrajeras.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aLa Estanzuela, Colonia, (Uruguay): INIA$c2021
520 $aCultiDatos_uy es una herramienta desarrollada por INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria del Uruguay, www.inia.uy), en base a información pública disponible de la Evaluación Nacional de Cultivares (ENC) del Uruguay de INASE (Instituto Nacional de Semillas). CultiDatos_uy, le posibilita acceder a las principales características de un material o comparar materiales para la correcta elección de acuerdo a su situación productiva particular. La información suministrada resume las principales variables de la evaluación de cada material. Si Usted desea ampliar, buscar información específica o más detallada sobre un cultivar y sus datos, siempre es recomendable acceder a la información de la Evaluación Nacional de Cultivares disponible en http://www.inia.org.uy/convenio_inase_inia/convenio/convenio.htm. El objetivo de CultiDatos_uy, es facilitar el acceso a la información generada en la ENC de una forma amigable, donde pueda buscar datos específicos de un material conociendo su nombre o empresa representante y/o hacer un análisis comparativo entre materiales.
650 $aFORRAJERAS
650 $aSELECCION DE ESPECIES
653 $aHERRAMIENTA DE ANÁLISIS
653 $aINSTRUCTIVO DE USO
700 1 $aCASTRO, M.
700 1 $aCUITIÑO, M.J.
700 1 $aNOLLA, F.
700 1 $aCASTRO, B.
700 1 $aCARDOZO, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/08/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZIA, M.E.; MEDEROS, A.; MANTECA, X.; TURNER, S.; MCMANUS, C.; ZAGO, D.; JARDIM BARCELLOS, J.O. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZIA, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.; AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; XAVIER MANTECA, Department of Animal and Food Science, School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.; SIMON TURNER, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Scotland's Rural College.; CONCEPTA MCMANUS, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia.; DANIELE ZAGO, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. |
|
Título : |
A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Research in Veterinary Science, 2017, no. 114, p. 430-443. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.014 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 21 December 2016 // Received in revised form: 4 July 2017 // Accepted 16 July 2017 |
|
Contenido : |
A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted
electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and
treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 =56.7%) and ADG (I2 =79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals
showed no change (P?0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ?0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P=0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P=0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P=0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle. MenosA systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted
electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and
treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 =56.7%) and ADG (I2 =79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals
showed no change (P?0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ?0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P=0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P=0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P=0.091), respectively... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANALGESIA; ANIMAL WELFARE; PAIN. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIENESTAR ANIMAL; CASTRACION; CIENCIAS VETERINARIAS; GANADO DE CARNE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L70 Ciencias veterinarias e higiene - Aspectos generales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02654naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1028593
005 2019-08-08
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.014$2DOI
100 1 $aANDRIGHETTO CANOZZIA, M.E.
245 $aA meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle.
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle history: Received: 21 December 2016 // Received in revised form: 4 July 2017 // Accepted 16 July 2017
520 $aA systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2 =56.7%) and ADG (I2 =79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals showed no change (P?0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P ?0.05) cortisol concentration after 30 min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P=0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120 min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814 g/d (P=0.001) and by 0.140 g/d (P=0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle.
650 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
650 $aCASTRACION
650 $aCIENCIAS VETERINARIAS
650 $aGANADO DE CARNE
653 $aANALGESIA
653 $aANIMAL WELFARE
653 $aPAIN
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
700 1 $aMANTECA, X.
700 1 $aTURNER, S.
700 1 $aMCMANUS, C.
700 1 $aZAGO, D.
700 1 $aJARDIM BARCELLOS, J.O.
773 $tResearch in Veterinary Science, 2017, no. 114, p. 430-443.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
